Wenzel Mrozinski, Author at Strategyroom.org Sun, 07 Nov 2021 12:13:36 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3 https://strategyroom.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Screenshot_2022-09-06_at_14-12-41_Step_3_of_4_Edit_Your_Logo_LogoMaker-removebg-preview-150x150.png Wenzel Mrozinski, Author at Strategyroom.org 32 32 Agile is Still One of The Greatest Approach to Management https://strategyroom.org/agile-is-still-one-of-the-greatest-approach-to-management/ Wed, 06 Oct 2021 06:50:53 +0000 https://strategyroom.org/?p=7

Agile is still relevant for any modern company. Its principles, which were written and implemented 20 years ago, are still the best. This realization came to me when I worked at large software company. But Agile became even more relevant since that time, because it helps to tackle two fundamental challenges: scaling and building a team. Agile helped us to cope with both challenges.

Agile bases on actual needs of the business. Therefore, it can help companies to choose the best way to growth, while at the same time keeping them within limits of personal, time and budget.

So, why Agile is so great? Here’s why:

  • Agile doesn’t really need any software development. You just have to make small changes to your processes or workflows during the set periods of time. No big changes, no fancy software, just small changes that have an immediate positive impact and get bigger after a few months.
  • There are no special requirements to work in Agile. Your employees don’t have to master special jargon or understand new software architecture. You can use whatever technology you’re most comfortable with.
  • Agile methodology is flexible, iterative and supports different types of teams. Most of all, It makes the development process more efficient by breaking old processes into small tasks which are easily done and easily changed.
  • It makes communication easier and makes planning and analyzing your work much easier. No matter how complicated your processes or system, with Agile you can break them down into manageable tasks and see what they are about and where their weaknesses could be.

My story with Agile had started when I was given the opportunity to become president of a global software development team, and was faced with the difficult and daunting task of leading such a team to its potential through the implementation of Agile. Having an opportunity to grow on other areas of growth was enticing, but as I grew and moved from one project to another, I realized that many of the core benefits that had been presented to me, in this organization, were actually quite limiting, and very different from what a software development team wanted to experience.

I met with my partner, who already worked with Agile for a while, to get a sense of this methodology. He taught me a great deal about Agile processes and told me of how he approached Agile in the past. As a result of this meeting, we decided to start a new project together on this methodology, to see how it fit with the current state of the business. It was obvious for us that it can be a great way to rebuild the company and to develop current processes at the same time. One of the first challenge for us was to define some terms which were important for some team members (or, at least, some of them), before we had enough experience to use a new methodology in new environment

We ended up choosing to lead a project, that incorporated Agile, which had three critical benefits:

  • Improve Team Capabilities
  • Improve Product Capabilities
  • Improve Working Environment
  • Improved Performance at the Product Level

Each of these benefits represented something that the team had asked for from me, and would have an impact on how they would interact with their customers/partners. Each of these benefits took us back to our definition of what was important to us, as a company, to have the team grow in an effective way to provide more and more value to our customers and partners. We came out of the project with the realization that any company, regardless of its size and scope, will benefit from these types of improvements. The challenge we faced was to figure out a way to give each of these benefits to the team in a way that they would be able to implement and achieve these improvements without changing their working process or their approach to their day-to-day operations.

]]>
Organizational Transformation is Very Hard https://strategyroom.org/organizational-transformation-is-very-hard/ Wed, 06 Oct 2021 06:16:29 +0000 https://strategyroom.org/?p=1

Organizational change is important for any business that want to survive and prosper. However, it’s very hard to do a proper transformation of the company. I’ve come to this realization two years ago, when I took over as CEO of a mid-sized company and faced the difficult task of transforming the company.

The company had been established more than twenty years ago, so it’s a long history. The company had achieved some significant achievements in terms of achieving sales, but, unfortunately, they were achieved at the price of their shareholders, because the managers lacked of vision and the ability for making changes. However, I was able to establish effective management processes. The company also had established strong brand management which provided a lot of value to customers. It was also very well positioned economically in comparison to competitors at the same size. In one year, I introduced major organizational changes resulting in a reduction of the number of top managers, a reorganizing of the executive team that brought their expertise to the company, a change of the strategic directions, and a process for strategic planning. I also introduced strategic marketing program, strengthened the brand management activities, and provided various solutions such as cost reduction, better business processes and an increase of human resources. It took me two years to transform the company. I believe that this is an incredible experience for me since I had never considered that I will meet such a challenge.

So, why did out company changed only this much? Why we couldn’t achieve more and became even bigger? From the very very beginning, I had to face the fact that I had no real plan for this company. I could only assume a strategic change. I had to create a new organization that would facilitate me in making the strategic plans, as well as taking care of the organization. As it turned out, the transformation happened slowly. At the beginning of this transformation process, I knew nothing about the internal structure of the company and what the functions of each department were. I had to create a plan that would allow me to identify what each department was carrying out under the leadership of each manager. I had to develop a functional structure that would allow me to plan each department in detail at the beginning and to know what it was and what it was supposed to achieve. Later, I had to identify the organization of the company. I had to develop a structure of the organization, a way to run the organization that would allow me to be aware of all the activities and their purposes. I started the process of building up the internal structure. This was a long-term process; for example, the first two years I thought that there would not be anything special in terms of structure. Later on I realized that I had to structure it in such way that it would allow me to understand what my employees were really doing. In addition, I had to create a way to know which employees were engaged in what department and in what function. I also had to create a functional structure based on employee functions in detail, as well as to allocate each function to each department in the company. The most difficult part of the experience was to identify which were the functions of the company. I had to find out which functions would allow me to achieve my goal and which would not.

When we started the process, I knew nothing about internal structure of the company. It certainly wasn’t a good situation. This was a good beginning; however, the internal structure was created under a very heavy burden because the leaders had no idea about what they were doing and what the company was, as well as what each manager did. It was not possible for me to know the real internal structure and the actual function of each employees in detail. In addition, I had to find out the real purposes of each employee. I had to have a process for making strategic plans. To make a strategic plan, one had to know how the company was organized, what its main functions and business strategies were, the roles of top management and employees in these areas, and the direction of each strategic plan.

]]>